Jump to content

MasterOz

Members
  • Content Count

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MasterOz

  1. 56 minutes ago, iBEE_tH3_RuL3R said:

    This just made me realize that you literally have no idea what you're saying and regarding what you're saying, honestly. The level of contradiction your statement have with respect to one another is just amazing and yet equally disappointing. 

    Interested in knowing what you realized.

    56 minutes ago, iBEE_tH3_RuL3R said:

    And also, is comparing two or three very different servers with one another sounds fair to you just due to one single skin?? 

    You got me wrong here. ofc not

    56 minutes ago, iBEE_tH3_RuL3R said:

    And last but not the least, like I have said multiple times, just like you feel free to express your suggestions regarding OneVice and its servers, exactly in the same way others are respected alongside their opinions. So If someone is contradicting you, do not take it personally and act in a way that's not suitable for you, thanks and peace...

    Worth giving attention. Also quoting something,

    "The wiser you get, the less you speak"

    I agree that recent post by me wasn't very suitable. But let's just stay on topic for the most part. I hope the poll won't be closed anytime sooner than 3 days.

    • Funny 1
    • Sad 1
  2. On 5/1/2021 at 11:27 PM, Pavonis said:

    This isn't 1v1 dueling championship, there is a big difference between 20 players fighting and 2 players fighting. Taxi skin was for sure handled easily in 1v1 situations but not if 10 players front of u with same bugged skin.

    Wanna explain why EAD and KoTH players never complained about taxi skin? And we acknowledge that both have/had 20+ playercount on a regular basis. It's just now that some guys are weeping over a minor issue. Anyways I will try hard not to let the taxi skin be removed just because some players want it to be so. Let's see who wins

     

    • Agree 1
    • Funny 2
  3. This way they will be able to make kills illegally on players while playing freely.

    Of course, there are many servers imposing wrong bans etc but not all are wrong bans and this recent EC ban on V2X an co. along with KOTH ban was right. EazyM4, one of the caught cheaters was kicked from his own clan in the proceeding of this case. You can't deny it at least.  

  4. 42 minutes ago, =SpitFire= said:

    For first of all, not every .asi/.dll is a cheat, it might be some sort of mod. However, .asi mods are not allowed in the server, which results that anti-cheat just won't let you play, until you remove the file, so there is no reason to ban players for that, this makes no sense for me. And you know, cheaters nowdays knows how to hide their cheats, which means a cheater will always find a way to cheat. But for this case, there is staff members on duty and report section on forum, so sooner or later a player who is playing not clean will be caught and banned. 

    That is just a part of the suggestion, what I suggested was to implement bans on players which are caught and banned from other community servers or forums. Thanks for clarifying though.

  5. Hi,

    Most servers nowadays don't ban cheaters until they are caught in their own servers hacking. This increases the probability of them using hacks in the servers in which they aren't punished.

    Recently, V2X and P4P4 were allowed to play in the server due to the rule and one of them (P4P4) was spotted using illegal files which the server's anti-cheat detected and kicked the cheater. Although he was still allowed to play since he probably removed the file but no guarantee he won't use it in the future. Now, the fact that they were caught in EC and were also punished on VU forums by not letting them play in the on-going event India vs Pakistan match situated in KoTH at that time.

    Letting such guys play without even a ban-appeal or a statement of shamefulness is pretty much unfair to the players playing clean. That's why I am suggesting that from now on, if a player is banned from a community forum, official server or a well known server shouldn't be allowed to play in RTV or OneVice servers. 
    Doubts on judgement can be also discussed in between staff members.

    IMO, this is the best way to keep hackers away from RTV. Thanks.

    • Funny 1
  6. Hi,

    Giving a spotlight on the background of bringing this suggestion on forums is because it was suggested in-game by myself to add taximen skin. But it was outright rejected since developers don't want it and they had their reasons.

    So bringing it to the forums, I would like to state that there's quite a good amount of people that uses taximen skin or small skins to enjoy their gameplay at the fullest. There are 3 men(tall skins) currently in RTV for both red and blue teams. It won't hurt much to replace the existing most less used skin with taxi skin or add it as the #4 skin. 

    Please whoever visits forum, drop your opinion with strong reasons. Again mentioning, don't just come by and say "We like it" or "We dislike it" but make sure to have reasons to back them up. 

    • Agree 1
  7. Whenever a base is switched by the script/server, it usually takes 5 seconds time. It is enough for the attackers nearby or already in the CP to plant the bomb and easily camp the site. Whereas defenders who have just managed to defend the previous site, can't reach it in time and it happens almost every time.

    Therefore, I suggest to increase the base switch time upto 15 seconds so that both teams can atleast reach the site and then the results coming out will be fair and square.

     

  8. It is well known that some times in a round, the defending team defuses the bomb again and again same goes for attacking team which keeps on planting the bomb. In most cases attacking team wins whereas the defenders try hard but lose due to unfair reasons.

    To neutralize a little unbalance in the gamemode, it would be fair to implement a time deduction of 10-20 seconds after every successful bomb defusal.

×
×
  • Create New...